Conference Talk Review Criteria 1 - Conflict of Interest
Criteria 1 - Description
Conference Talk Review - If you have a conflict of interest, please declare it here. A conflict of interest may include, but is not limited to: having a personal relationship with a submitter, having a business relationship with a submitter, being in direct competition with the submitter and/or their business, or having any other relationship that may bias your judgment. If you’re unsure whether there’s a conflict of interest, please skip this review and/or check with your sub-committee lead for guidance.
Criteria 1 - Option
Option | Outcome |
Yes | Skip Review |
No | Continue with review |
Conference Talk Review Criteria 2 - Session Title
Criteria 2 - Description
Conference Talk Review - Is the session title catchy, does it generate interest, and is it aligned with the topic? Or, does the session title need to be reworked to better align with the session topic or to generate interest?
Criteria 2 - Option
Option | Score |
Yes - the title is catchy, generates interest, and is aligned with topic | 1 |
No - the title needs to be reworked | 0 |
Conference Talk Review Criteria 3 - What is the session about?
Criteria 3 - Description
Conference Talk Review - By referring to the information provided in the Session Summary section, it is evident that the session topic is relevant, insightful and/or interesting. Please indicate whether the topic is relevant, interesting, and valuable to the target audience.
Criteria 3 - Option
Option | Score |
Definitely Is - the session topic is definitely relevant, insightful and /or interesting | 3 |
Probably Is - the session topic is probably relevant, insightful and /or interesting | 2 |
Probably Is Not - the session topic is probably not relevant, insightful and /or interesting | 1 |
Definitely Is Not - the session topic is definitely not relevant, insightful and /or interesting | 0 |
Conference Talk Review Criteria 4 - Learning - What will attendees take away from the session?
Criteria 4 - Description
Conference Talk Review - By referring to the information provided in the Learning Outcomes, Session Delivery, and Session Time Block sections, the session has at least three clear learning outcomes that will provide attendees with new knowledge and/or skills that they will be able to apply to their work and/or life. Please indicate whether attendees will gain new knowledge and/or skills that can be applied to their work or life after attending the session.
Criteria 4 - Option
Option | Score |
Definitely Will - attendees will definitely gain applicable knowledge and/or skills | 3 |
Probably Will - attendees will probably gain applicable knowledge and/or skills | 2 |
Probably Will Not - attendees will probably not gain applicable knowledge and/or skills | 1 |
Definitely Will Not - attendees will definitely not gain applicable knowledge and/or skills | 0 |
Conference Talk Review Criteria 5 - Format - How is the session delivered?
Criteria 5 - Description
Conference Talk Review - By referring to the information provided in the Learning Outcomes, Session Delivery, and Session Time Block sections, the organization of the session is clear. The author has included a session outline and has identified key activities and/or resources to be used during the session. Please indicate whether the session format will support the learning outcomes.
Criteria 5 - Option
Option | Score |
Definitely Will - the session format will definitely hold attendees' interest and achieve the learning outcomes | 3 |
Probably Will - the session format will probably hold attendees' interest and achieve the learning outcomes | 2 |
Probably Will Not - the session format will probably not hold attendees' interest and achieve the learning outcomes | 1 |
Definitely Will Not - the session format will definitely not hold attendees' interest and achieve the learning outcomes | 0 |
Conference Talk Review Criteria 6 - Final Evaluation
Criteria 6 - Description
Conference Talk Review - Given everything you’ve read for this submission, would you accept this session into the program?
Criteria 6 - Option
Option | Score |
Yes, accept this session as it will be valuable for the program and a worthwhile investment | 3 |
No, unless there are revisions made based on the provided feedback | 0 |
No, do not accept the session | 0 |
Conference Talk Review Criteria 7 - Elaborate on Your Final Evaluation Response
Criteria 7 - Description
Conference Talk Review - Please provide your most significant argument(s) for ACCEPTING or NOT ACCEPTING this submission? Include any additional feedback you have for the submission
Criteria 7 - Option
Free text section with no option
Conference Talk Review Criteria 8 - Feedback for the Speaker
Criteria 8 - Description
Conference Talk Review - Please provide clear and actionable feedback about the submission that can be shared with the speaker. Please note, this feedback will be sent to the speaker as-is, so please use discretion and thoughtfulness when generating your feedback.
Criteria 8 - Option
Free text section with no option
Comments